<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abraham&#8217;s Adultery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/</link>
	<description>Avoiding Hackneyed...Making Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnnisP</title>
		<link>http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/comment-page-1/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>EnnisP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 04:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowthinkaboutit.com/?p=506#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a very good question Gilbert.

The Romans 4 text, particular verse 19, is referring specifically to the moment of conception not Abraham&#039;s entire life. The complete verse reads:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead , when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sara&#039;s womb&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Abraham was 100 and Sara was 90 and Isaac&#039;s conception, though miraculous, still required normal conjugal relations. With the relationship turbulence that had gone before (remember, Hagar and Ishmael were still around) and obvious biological deterioration due to age (it is likely that Sara&#039;s menstrual cycle had stopped), Abraham and Sara could both have faltered. But, instead, believing God they engaged in normal relations which resulted in a miraculous conception.

Therefore, we understand that Abraham became the father of faith not because he never faltered but because he never quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a very good question Gilbert.</p>
<p>The Romans 4 text, particular verse 19, is referring specifically to the moment of conception not Abraham&#8217;s entire life. The complete verse reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead , when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sara&#8217;s womb</p></blockquote>
<p>Abraham was 100 and Sara was 90 and Isaac&#8217;s conception, though miraculous, still required normal conjugal relations. With the relationship turbulence that had gone before (remember, Hagar and Ishmael were still around) and obvious biological deterioration due to age (it is likely that Sara&#8217;s menstrual cycle had stopped), Abraham and Sara could both have faltered. But, instead, believing God they engaged in normal relations which resulted in a miraculous conception.</p>
<p>Therefore, we understand that Abraham became the father of faith not because he never faltered but because he never quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Graham</title>
		<link>http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowthinkaboutit.com/?p=506#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>Why does Paul say that Abraham &quot;...being not weak in faith, ...&quot; (Romans 4:19) and &quot;[h]e staggered not at the promise of God...&quot; (Romns 4:20), when it appears that Abraham doubted God by giving heed to his wife to take Hagar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does Paul say that Abraham &#8220;&#8230;being not weak in faith, &#8230;&#8221; (Romans 4:19) and &#8220;[h]e staggered not at the promise of God&#8230;&#8221; (Romns 4:20), when it appears that Abraham doubted God by giving heed to his wife to take Hagar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyne Wilkes</title>
		<link>http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/comment-page-1/#comment-2857</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyne Wilkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowthinkaboutit.com/?p=506#comment-2857</guid>
		<description>So much for family value ha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So much for family value ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moses Massacres Midian &#124; NowTHINK!AboutIt</title>
		<link>http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/comment-page-1/#comment-2318</link>
		<dc:creator>Moses Massacres Midian &#124; NowTHINK!AboutIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowthinkaboutit.com/?p=506#comment-2318</guid>
		<description>[...] is fair to be forgiving. Abraham and Sara were faced with difficult and unusual circumstances. But justifying polygamy as anything other than adultery is going a little too far and that is what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is fair to be forgiving. Abraham and Sara were faced with difficult and unusual circumstances. But justifying polygamy as anything other than adultery is going a little too far and that is what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abraham's Adultery And Divorce &#124; NowTHINK!AboutIt</title>
		<link>http://nowthinkaboutit.com/2009/09/abrahams-adultery/comment-page-1/#comment-2104</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham's Adultery And Divorce &#124; NowTHINK!AboutIt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nowthinkaboutit.com/?p=506#comment-2104</guid>
		<description>[...] In Abraham’s case he gave affection to Hagar which he previously promised to Sara. His relationship to Hagar was legally right but personally wrong. It was adultery. Sara was offended and insulted that Abraham was foolish enough to entertain the suggestion.  All she wanted was understanding and reassurance. She got neither. A full discussion on why Abraham was vulnerable to this suggestion can be found here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In Abraham’s case he gave affection to Hagar which he previously promised to Sara. His relationship to Hagar was legally right but personally wrong. It was adultery. Sara was offended and insulted that Abraham was foolish enough to entertain the suggestion.  All she wanted was understanding and reassurance. She got neither. A full discussion on why Abraham was vulnerable to this suggestion can be found here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

